Archive for the ‘Cryonics’ Category

The 2.0 Project on Marblejars

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

[Commentary]

Mark McAllister started The 2.0 Project a couple years ago to bring attention to the plight of those who cannot secure the insurance or funding required for cryonics preservation services due to pre-existing conditions. I interviewed him for a Frontier Channel article about his efforts and he has since become a good friend.

On February 08, 2008 the next version of The 2.0 Project website is expected to launch, with an expanded mission. I have seen some of the early concept art for Mark’s new site and it is fantastic. The new placeholder hints at what is coming. I cannot wait to see the new site.

Mark recently posted a video on Marblejars, a fundraising site centered around video messages. Under the topic “Funding for Cryonics Suspension” Mark discusses Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) and his efforts to raise US$80,000 (or marbles in Marblejars parlance) for cryonics suspension services from Alcor Life Extension Foundation.

I have highlighted other fundraiser efforts recently. If you have the funds to support occasional donations to worthwhile causes with a transhumanist bent, Mark’s fundraising effort is one to seriously consider.


No Graveyard

Tuesday, October 9th, 2007

Alcor sign at facility in Scottsdale, AZ, USA

Image Credit: Simone Syed - Alcor sign at facility in Scottsdale, AZ, USA

[Alcor Conference - Table of Contents]

In a graveyard, dirt and sorrow reside with rot hidden by little more than fading flowers, expensive coffins and shallow depths. Death hangs in the air. The graveyard is a solemn place, or at the very most morbidly curious. For comfort, visitors must find another location, like a church, or their death traditions passed down for generations with the certainty that the next life is not this life.

Alcor is no graveyard.

On a warm October 07, 2007 Sunday in Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, Alcor opened its doors for an open house, capping a weekend of talks during the 7th Alcor Conference. Outside in the parking lot was a BBQ: shredded meat on rolls, vegetarian lasagna, a salad dripping with dressing, and peach cobbler. Speakers and audience members from the conference and Alcor staff and members, some with children, gathered around tables for pleasant discussion, networking, and family. This was not a solemn place. Instead, it was a very happy one, despite the clinically dead hanging out just inside the Alcor facility.

Alcor is a cryonics company. Here they take the remains of members who signed up for expensive services years before and cryopreserve them in the hope that someday technology will advance so far that the cryopreserved will be resurrected. Cryopreservation procedures flush most water out of the human body and replace it with cryoprotectants, before the member is stored in huge dewars of liquid nitrogen.

All this “cryo” is the technical prefix for something like freezing, but without the nasty side effects. To freeze is to introduce water ice crystals, dangerous daggers that wreak havoc on delicate biological material. A strawberry placed in a freezer might look beautiful when pulled out frozen, but let it thaw and what you are left with is a mushy remnant. Cryogenics (not to be confused with cryonics!) researchers have developed technology that allows the vitrification of biological material, without most of the side effects of freezing. Ice crystals are minimized by removing the water from which they grow, replaced with compounds that instead turn into a glass-like, smooth substance at low temperatures. Biological material becomes encased, vitrified, inside and out, and the chemical reactions that generally race forward come to a near standstill.

Making use of cryogenics technology to vitrify human remains is cryonics. While vitrification has been demonstrated to work, thawing, repairing, and returning the body to life has not. Alcor bluntly admits to this in their marketing and conferences, but they also hint that there is a very minuscule - but perhaps non-zero? - chance that someday technology will become just so advanced as to revive Alcor’s cryopreserved members. This is the tiny hope that makes this third option to dealing with human body remains, instead of burial or cremation, so appealing to some people. After all, these cryonics proponents claim, they certainly will be no worse off if it turns out recovery from cryopreservation is not possible.

Inside the Alcor facility is the gear for modern cryopreservation. Open house attendees signed up for tours of the facility, spread out over the afternoon to allow everyone to eat and mingle. In the first room is the future.

Research on Rats

With money from membership fees, donations, and insurance policies signed over to Alcor to pay for services upon a member’s death, the company makes enough to struggle with rising operations costs and services that can begin at the member’s bedside just prior to legal death. In recent years they have stabilized financially while recognizing that their best bet for new members, and therefore more money, rests with proving scientifically some of the claims of cryonics. Therefore Alcor is investing in a new animal model to use for research in cryopreservation and revival.

Alcor use to experiment on dogs. As expenses have increased and animal rights activists have sought more stringent guidelines regarding research animals, the dog model has become difficult to maintain. The use of rats instead may provide a host of benefits, along with some difficulties. There is little regulation of rat laboratory models, but, fully expecting activists to begin targeting the use of rodents in the near future, Alcor has decided to abide by the same regulation as dogs. This means unnecessary paperwork and procedures until they become, as expected, absolutely necessary.

This research future is in first room we visit on the tour. Central to the room is a cardiopulmonary bypass apparatus, many, many times smaller than similar equipment used for larger animals and humans. Some of it has been custom built, and Alcor research associate Chana de Wolf has been practicing with this new equipment in preparation for future work on real rats. There is a small cooling stage where a rat will be connected to the Circuit, a ring of devices like the pump and the oxygenator that act as a mechanical heart and lungs, respectively. Also attached are the chiller for control fluid temperatures. Blood can be washed out of the rat body with a fluid consisting of blood and various concentrations of cryopreservants and other compounds. Someday, research using this equipment and the rat model might lead to improved cryopreservants, more effective concentrations, improved equipment and techniques, and, perhaps, the first animal revived after lengthy cryopreservation. Alcor has not yet begun active research with the rat model while they continue to equip this laboratory with the necessary tools.

Improving Cryopreservation

While this research effort ramps up, Alcor’s primary task remains the cryopreservation of members. The next room on the tour is the testing site for new equipment that will automate previously manual and time-consuming procedures. A contractor to Alcor showed us the latest patient pod, an enclosed table in which the member is placed upon arrival at the facility. Liquid nitrogen vapor is pumped into the pod to continue the cooling down process that begins with technicians out in the field prior to transport to Alcor. The body’s water is removed and replaced by chemicals that can be toxic if introduced at too high a temperature. A fine balance between temperature, pressure and percent concentration of cryoprotectants will be maintained automatically by new monitoring software and equipment, replacing what use to be manual “eye-balling.” Should something go wrong, the software will begin appropriate countermeasures.

The new table helps consolidate steps that could previously lead to non-nominal temperature increases, threatening the effectiveness of the cryopreservation. After all, for cryonics to work, further damage to the member’s body must be minimized. Presumably this care will lead to an easier revival in the future. The new table can manage a temperature drop to -100 degrees Celsius, cutting out a previous step that required the body be removed from the pod and moved to other equipment in another room.

Improving Stabilization and Transport

As mentioned previously, there are procedures that precede the arrival of a member’s body at Alcor. Several volunteer field technicians located around the country await that fateful call: a member has just been pronounced legally dead, or legal death is imminent. The technicians travel to the patient’s location to begin the necessary paperwork, interaction with family and medical personnel, and initial cryopreservation procedures. All of this is done as quickly as possible to prevent brain and body damage as decomposition begins.

Currently these technicians must carry with them seven large kits full of tools, equipment, and chemicals. The number of kits can lead to difficulties and delays when traveling, and requires significant effort to tote around. Tanya Jones, COO of Alcor, and her team have revisited the contents of these kits to streamline them to just three. Content like freezer bags for ice, walkie talkies, batteries, medical tools, gloves, and infusion medications have been considered in detail to help minimize what needs to be included in these kits.

When deployed in the field, these kits will include a new portable ice bath that is lighter and easier to setup than the current model, while improving insulation during transport with the use of aerogel. The design is expected to accommodate new equipment that can be directly attached to the ice bath frame to maintain circulation in the body during transport, an important consideration when introducing cryopreservants into the body.

Finally, a new portable perfusion system has been developed that significantly reduces the previous system’s steep learning curve. Improved with automated monitoring equipment and debubbling circuit technology, the new system now requires only two connections: one to a cold water source, followed by one to the patient. This greatly simplifies the steps technicians need to take. The system washes out the patient’s blood and begins the initial infusion of cryoprotectants. One significant size and weight reduction has been with the computer controller, a device that had not been updated since the middle of last decade.

The next room we visited was the operating room, where the current patient table and equipment reside. The heart bypass machine circulates cooled cryoprotectants while Alcor staff continue the patient’s cryopreservation. This equipment will be replaced when design and testing of the new technology is completed. Testing is expected to begin later this year.

The Cryopreserved

The last stop in the tour was the patient care bay, the location of 76 people who have been cryopreserved since the first person, Dr. James H. Bedforf was cryopreserved in 1967 in an dewar he designed himself. Family and volunteers maintained the dewar for the next twenty years until he was moved to Alcor.

Five full-body cryopreserved members can fit head down in a modern dewar. Some members choose a less expensive plan that preserves only their head and brain, and several of these neuropreservations fit in the center of the five member storage bays in one dewar.

A bulk tank contains a 4 month supply of liquid nitrogen. Liquid nitrogen can maintain its temperature at -196 degrees Celsius without power, so these dewars require no power source or backup, just the occasional automatic topping off from the bulk tank.

We did not enter the patient care bay directly but looked in through a large window. It is here that one immediately notices the differences that make Alcor no graveyard. People speak at normal volume levels and with excited passion about the technology, full of their own hopes for cryopreservation and eventual revival. A conference attendee from Australia finished his paperwork to become the latest member of Alcor while attendees from Quebec, Canada watched in excitement. Some of the people in the tour were already signed up and excited by the apparent effort by Alcor to continue improving their technologies while preparing to mount new research efforts. Others were new or prospective members seeing for the first time the technical side of cryonics. Perhaps a bit annoyed by certain personalities and questions, the Alcor staff who led the tour nonetheless remained professional. The staff was knowledgeable and, like everyone else, noticeably passionate about what they do.

Alcor calls itself a “Life Extension Foundation.” Whether or not cryonics works, to some people Alcor offers something coffins and cremation urns cannot. While those repositories for human remains are traditional and final, the dewars of Alcor are shiny and metal, standing tall and cold in the hopefully labeled patient care bay as symbols of technology and optimism for the future. Here death is reduced to a temporary legal and cultural existence if only science and technology continue their rapid progress forward to repair and recovery. For cryonics proponents, where there is such hope, optimism and steady progress, there is no graveyard.


Alcor Conference - Table of Contents

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

Frontier Channel liveblogging from the 7th Alcor Conference:

Day 1

Day 2


Alcor Conference - Christine Peterson

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

[Alcor Conference - Table of Contents]

Christine Peterson presented “Good News, Bad News, Surprising News” about life extension. She now spends about half time studying life extension as an enthusiast.

She began by stating that terminology matters. Which terms are best: life extension, health extension, anti-aging, longevity, immortality, or permanent health?

Since we are made out of meat, we enjoy the pleasures of life, but we end up aging and dying. Life extension enthusiasts want a pill to extend life, but nothing like that exists now. Medical doctors, researchers, and the FDA are not interested in life extension, in addition to the overall challenges of the biology of aging and possible research into ways to extend healthy lifespan.

She surveyed quickly those for and against life extension, including Leon Kass, Bill Clinton, Aubrey de Grey, and others. There are soft and hard approaches to the problem, including SENS and nanotechnology, and eventually nanomedicine.

A list of things that will help to buy some time until radical life extension technologies are available:

  • stress reduction
  • physical risk reduction
  • mood improvement
  • sleep, in a very dark room,
  • Sex (quantity M, quality F)
  • Laughter
  • Biomarker testing
  • Calorie Restriction
    • 35 few calories than normal
  • Reducing inflammaging
    • decreasing inflammation by reducing visceral fat
    • dieting does not work
    • Slow way - we eat for pleasure
    • Treat value = yumminess x amount
    • Pleasure = qulaity x quantity
    • Keep treat value high
    • Increase yumminess - healthy treats all the time (nuts, cheese, fruit, chocolate, cheese popcord every day. Then I can be good with other foods
    • 100 cal/day for one lb/month loss; these tweaks are easy to find.
    • The bizarre way
    • Shangri-La Diet - not a diet
    • Flavorless calories before a meal
    • Trick to feel full. Alientation from food
    • Be gradual
  • Supplements
    • Supplements can do damage
    • You can create conflicts and overdo it
    • Therefore more testing is required
  • Movement: require fun
    • Math and science teachers in charge of gym class, to get rid of evil coaches
    • Don’t look at calorie/minute displays on exercise machines
    • 10,000 steps per day
    • Spend money on a personal trainer
  • Uploading - more radical and possible further into the future.
  • Biostasis (cryonics) - conserving structure - many of us will run out of time, so this is the backup plan.

Finally, Peterson noted that it is important to get life insurance, even if you are not planning to sign up for cryonics until later. Death can be unexpected, and cryonics remains a last option if other current life extension efforts do not work out.


Alcor Conference - Calvin Mercer

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

[Recap]

Calvin Mercer asked “Cryonics and Religion: Friends or Foes?”  Cryonics, Mercer believes, will require support from more people than just scientists, including religious people.  How should cryogenics supporters present these ideas to religious people?

How the discussion will play out, according to Mercer, will include debates between liberal and conservative viewpoints, anthropocentric versus theocentric beliefs, materialism versus the supernatural, pragmatic versus dogmatic outlooks, and revisionists versus traditionalists.  This will show up as supporters and critics in the various Christian religions.

Mercer seeks to generate discussion about radical life extension among liberal religious people and someday among conservative religious people, starting with academics.  He provided two examples of success, including sessions at a conference and a book.

Liberal religious people are most concerned about issues of justice and fairness.  They worry that these technologies will not be available for everyone.  On the right are the conservatives, and Mercer said there are degrees of conservatism, but with common characteristics like belief in the supernatural and dogmatic thinking.

Mercer believes some conservatives will in fact embrace radical life extension.  They will be torn between their beliefs and their desire to get “being a good Christian” right to avoid going to Hell.

Christian faith includes the concept of the “miracle” of resurrection.  On the one hand there is resuscitation of the dead, like Lazarus. On the other there is transformation of the dead, like Jesus.  The dialog between radical life extentionists and religious people could be started around their ideas about “indefinite” lifespans and “infinite” existence, respectively.

[Commentary]

I would not expect an Alcor Conference talk about “Cryonics and Unicorns.”  I would not expect talks about “Cryonics and Astrology,” “Cryonics and Baseball Players,” or “Cryonics and Intelligent Design.”  However, I do understand that the majority of people are religious or spiritual.  Mercer presented this talk as an academic, rather than a theologist.


Alcor Conference - Morning Break

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

[Alcor Conference - Table of Contents]

Popcorn, cookies, and pretzels. We talked to a couple who are musicians and Alcor members about how art can be used to promote life extension and transhumanism.


Alcor Conference - Calvin Mercer

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

[Alcor Conference - Table of Contents]

[Recap]

Calvin Mercer asked “Cryonics and Religion: Friends or Foes?” Cryonics, Mercer believes, will require support from more people than just scientists, including religious people. How should cryogenics supporters present these ideas to religious people?

How the discussion will play out, according to Mercer, will include debates between liberal and conservative viewpoints, anthropocentric versus theocentric beliefs, materialism versus the supernatural, pragmatic versus dogmatic outlooks, and revisionists versus traditionalists. This will show up as supporters and critics in the various Christian religions.

Mercer seeks to generate discussion about radical life extension among liberal religious people and someday among conservative religious people, starting with academics. He provided two examples of success, including sessions at a conference and a book.

Liberal religious people are most concerned about issues of justice and fairness. They worry that these technologies will not be available for everyone. On the right are the conservatives, and Mercer said there are degrees of conservatism, but with common characteristics like belief in the supernatural and dogmatic thinking.

Mercer believes some conservatives will in fact embrace radical life extension. They will be torn between their beliefs and their desire to get “being a good Christian” right to avoid going to Hell.

Christian faith includes the concept of the “miracle” of resurrection. On the one hand there is resuscitation of the dead, like Lazarus. On the other there is transformation of the dead, like Jesus. The dialog between radical life extentionists and religious people could be started around their ideas about “indefinite” lifespans and “infinite” existence, respectively.

[Commentary]

I would not expect an Alcor Conference talk about “Cryonics and Unicorns.” I would not expect talks about “Cryonics and Astrology,” “Cryonics and Baseball Players,” or “Cryonics and Intelligent Design.” However, I do understand that the majority of people are religious or spiritual. Mercer presented this talk as an academic, rather than a theologist.


Alcor Conference - Steven Harris

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

[Alcor Conference - Table of Contents]

[Recap]

Steven Harris is a researcher developing “Rapid Body Cooling for Prevention of Brain Damage.” Rapid body cooling technologies are important to both cryonics and emerging short-term treatments. Hypothermia induced by lowering the body temperature by 4 degrees Celsius in five minutes could allow sufficient time for medical care workers to work to treat a patient, say, after a stabbing wound or other life-threatening injury.

Post-resuscitation hypothermia was discovered by accident in 1980 in dogs. Brain damage can be prevented and the animal resusciated after clinical death. The first human clinical trials failed, because it took too long to start cooling the patient’s body. Two other trials have been positive, including resusciation of cardiac-arrest patients.

Harris is working on a technology to rapidly cool the body. Using Cold Perfluorocarbon Liquid Lung Lavage, Harris has been able to lower the temperature 5.3 degrees in 5 minutes in a dog. The next day, the dog was up and active again.

[Commentary]

This is an incredibly exciting technology, but Harris seemed to be very pessimistic about popularizing it. According to Harris, because of short patents and socialism, new resuscitation technologies are difficult to develop and spread. There were a lot of technical details in the talk, and the speaker had to skip over many of them when time ran out. He ended with a video of a dog that appeared to be fine 24 hours after use of the technology.


Alcor Conference - Morning Panel

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

[Alcor Conference - Table of Contents]

Day two of the Alcor Conference. The day began with the “Human Cryopreservation and Critical Care Medicine Panel,” including Alcor’s Tanya Jones, critical care physician David Crippen and bioethicist Leslie Whetstine and moderated by Aschwin de Wolf.

[Recap]

The panelists discussed the various definitions death, including legal and biological, and the ethical issues of cryonics. A diagnosis of brain death is required for organ procurement as well as cryopreservation, but determining death is difficult. There are several steps within brain death and it is difficult to determine exactly what part of the process a brain may be in at any particular time. These difficulties and complexities require negotiation between hospital and Alcor personnel, and there are similarities and differences with organ donor requirements.

Alcor prefers the pronouncement of cardiac death over a pronouncement of brain death. Whetstine argued, however, that cardiac death is problematic. If the heart is dead, but the brain is not, and as technologies improve, then this could lead, according to Jones, to a time when the first steps of cryopreservation will transition from an after-death procedure to a medical procedure requiring trained medical personnel.

[Commentary]

The inclusion of a bioethicist in the panel added some drama to the proceedings. Whetstine appeared to be arguing (and this is a vast oversimplification of her argument) that it is okay to declare someone dead if their heart stopped, but it is wrong if you then want to cryopreserve the patient.

So when is a patient dead? When is it okay to cryopreserve them? Right now, Alcor must work within a legal and cultural framework that does not view cryonics as feasible and where the definition of death is changing. Jones said she believes Alcor will need to go on the offensive based on positive results, instead of waiting to be attacked. Whetstine was argumentative, but I found her arguments unclear. She obviously finds cryogenics problematic, but she kept repeating things like “but then they are not really dead” and “that is not death.” She works on the definition of death and believes it needs to be changed.

Some Alcor members were concerned about how their own personal wishes would affect decisions made upon their death. Crippen felt that physicians generally honor their patients wishes, but Whetstine felt patients’ consent should not be part of a declaration of death. Crippen said Alcor members need to get over thinking of consent as something that trumps legal and cultural issues.

Both Jones and Crippen believe that the framework will need to change for cryonics to be more acceptable. Alcor, said Jones, must be open about their arrangements to ensure a more positive future for Alcor.


Alcor Conference - Aubrey de Grey

Saturday, October 6th, 2007

[Alcor Conference - Table of Contents]

[Recap]

Does Aubrey de Grey really need an introduction at this point? His public proposal for repairing and reversing the damage of aging, SENS, and his public admission of being an Alcor member were the topics he discussed in “Is it Politically Safe for a Biologist to Support Cryonics Publicly?”

According to de Grey it is an important decision for a scientist to admit to supporting cryonics. A public acknowledgment of their support can affect their professional work. One of the dangers of being a leader in admitting to support is the lessened ability to procure funding. Funding peer review can be more difficult than publication peer review.

A cryonics leader provides public outreach and information. As other speakers have emphasized, legal death is only a convenience that needs constant review as technologies advance. Some people who are legally dead have in fact been revived, and this is something de Grey suggests the public be reminded of. Brain death is itself a complicated concept. Not only can a person be legally dead, they can be legally alive but functionally brain dead, via dementia, for example.

Cryonics supports can also provide ethical leadership. Cryonics supports can help demystify death and cryonics, promote cryonics as life saving, and provide facts for a useful ethical debate. Some people find cryonics “yucky” but a straightforward approach by scientists, rather than anger or ridicule, could be especially effective in demystifying the technology.

Science politics will also be affected by leadership. While mainstream cryobiologists support organ preservation, they do not generally embrace brain preservation. Leaders can point out this apparent discrepancy.

Leaders in this situation may be one of those lucky few who do not have to worry about dangers to their careers, funding, etc. De Grey believes he was lucky to have entered this field and “make trouble” without destroying his career. These lucky few should be able to help each other, until there is a tipping point toward broader support of cryonics.

De Grey believes he made the right decision to go public about his support of cryonics and Alcor membership.

[Commentary]

Leaders are important to any movement, and technologies themselves can be movements when tied to ideas like radical life extension. Cryonics support can be positively affected by people standing up and admitting they support the idea.

But what will be sacrificed when one stands up and stands behind such ideas? How does one talk about cryonics? These are important questions, and I think a review of other movements and how they address their own topics may be helpful.